<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Organizing your files</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frankie.bz/blog/lessons/organizing-your-files/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frankie.bz/v3/free-lessons/organizing-your-files/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=organizing-your-files</link>
	<description>Surprise yourself with award winning Art Director Frank Neulichedl</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 19:29:07 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: derfrankie</title>
		<link>http://www.frankie.bz/v3/free-lessons/organizing-your-files/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>derfrankie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 20:07:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frankie.bz/v3/?p=432#comment-28</guid>
		<description>I had the oportunity to buy my servers for my home office when Dell introduced their new starter rack range. For a limited time they where sold in Italy for 500 Euro - a bargain.

And if you have space and don&#039;t want to use rack servers you can start for the same price as a NAS. The one reason to start with a NAS is that you have less administration to do and you get used to use a server. So it might as you said be best as a middle step.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had the oportunity to buy my servers for my home office when Dell introduced their new starter rack range. For a limited time they where sold in Italy for 500 Euro &#8211; a bargain.</p>
<p>And if you have space and don&#8217;t want to use rack servers you can start for the same price as a NAS. The one reason to start with a NAS is that you have less administration to do and you get used to use a server. So it might as you said be best as a middle step.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gee Ranasinha</title>
		<link>http://www.frankie.bz/v3/free-lessons/organizing-your-files/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Gee Ranasinha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 16:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frankie.bz/v3/?p=432#comment-27</guid>
		<description>I agree with you on just about any server hardware being much faster than any NAS.  However for a SoHO sized business a NAS can be a good interim move before a company can justify a &#039;proper&#039; server purchase. However, if you do go down the NAS route make sure that you have a level of data redundancy.  Before getting servers and a RAID array at my own company, I had had a 5-drive NAS unit configured to RAID 6 which gave sterling service.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you on just about any server hardware being much faster than any NAS.  However for a SoHO sized business a NAS can be a good interim move before a company can justify a &#8216;proper&#8217; server purchase. However, if you do go down the NAS route make sure that you have a level of data redundancy.  Before getting servers and a RAID array at my own company, I had had a 5-drive NAS unit configured to RAID 6 which gave sterling service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/9 queries in 0.005 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 400/406 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.frankie.bz @ 2012-02-09 13:06:55 -->
